A storm has been brewing around Lake Mahopac, located 50 miles north of New York City, and it's not your typical spring thunderstorm. The uproar surrounds a rocky, ten-acre island in the lake appropriately named "Petra" (from the Greek word for stone) and the house that is being built there. Normally, building a house is no big news story, but this house comes with built-in controversy for many people.
In the 1950s, Ahmed K. Chahroudi, then owner of Petra Island asked Frank Lloyd Wright to design him a "masterpiece" for the site. Wright took him literally and designed a house that Mr. Chahroudi could not afford to build, and thus the design languished. 47 years after Frank Lloyd Wright's death, the house designed for Petra Island has a new lease on life and is in the process of being completed by current island owner, Joseph Massaro. He was intrigued by the Wright drawings for the house and decided to undertake building the house as close as possible to the original designs, including the dramatic 78-foot cantilever suspended over the lake, a huge interior skylight, and a massive island boulder (12 foot high, 40 foot long and 10 foot wide) which acts as the living room's focal point. Thomas A. Heinz, prolific author and architect was asked to help supervise the execution of the design and oversee its implementation. Petra Productions, a film company, is even shooting a PBS special about the house. All of this attention to Wright's detail and the quest to build the house as close to Wright's drawn plans are where most of the problems arise for some people.
There is a very vocal section of the Wright world that absolutely abhors projects of this nature. They see it as a tremendous waste of energy and an act of sacrilege to build anything in the modern age from Wright's lexicon of unbuilt projects. You only need to go on the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's message board to read the volumes of angry protests against the Petra Island house and other projects of this nature. It all brings up an interesting point: What's Wright, and What's Wrong.
The Wright world is a fascinating gaggle of fans, scholars, collectors, acolytes and critics. They travel the globe to see and experience first hand the architectural wonders that have sprung from the mind of Frank Lloyd Wright. They also spend a lot of money on books, magazines and assorted Frank Lloyd Wright relics (where available) and merchandise (another sore subject for many, and a whole separate discussion.) Frank Lloyd Wright's name is a phenomenon and some in this specialized world take offense when the perceived purity of the past designs are tainted by trying to execute them today and linking that famous name to them. Many of the naysayers are actual owners of original Wright houses, and one wonders if it isn't elitism masquerading as scholarly concern.
I see this whole argument as ultimately moot, since both sides are partially right and wrong. Wright himself was a big proponent for mining his own portfolio of past designs for new commissions in an attempt to have them built. It's true that the process of building one of his designs with him often meant modifications through every step of the project, but he wanted his ideas built...it does nothing for an architect to draw and write about buildings and never have them executed. Good ideas should be experienced by all; no matter who designed them, when they were executed and by whom. The caveat to this process of legacy building Wright designs is that they should be undertaken in the spirit of Wright, using a sensitivity to what the last known original designs called for and the knowledge of his system of "organic design."
It comes down to intent. If a design is bastardized for the sake of making a dollar off of it's pedigree, then there's a big problem. But, if the idea is sound and the building is built for the sake of using it for it's original intent and with an eye for being respectful towards its execution, then build away. I would rather have a legacy "Wright" home built with sensitivity and thoughfulness, than a thousand McMansions any day.
Who's right? That's for you to decide.
Rendering by Thomas A. Heinz,AIA