« Guggenheim Takes The Cake | Main | Wright Plus 2009 Wrap-Up »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bf72a53ef01156f94ac5f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Frank Lloyd Wright LEGO Sets:

Comments

Scott T.

Not sure about the Guggenheim one, but that's a pretty tough building for Lego to tackle, to be fair. Fallingwater, on the other hand, looks like it survived the translation to plastic bricks quite well! I'd love to have that on my desk. Maybe both desks.

Bubba Two Tone

Guggenheim is not "Wright".. Jacobs I would be the perfect Lego building.

Scott T.

Bubba TT: Jacobs I is the first one that came to my mind, too. That would be an excellent Lego set. But the house just doesn't have the cachet and marketability as the Guggenheim and Fallingwater. Probably not too difficult to work out on one's own, though, given the floorplan and photos from enough angles.

Luckless Pedestrian

Hey Bubba, just curious -- what do you mean when you say "Guggenheim is not 'Wright'"?
P.S. I agree, Jacobs I would be cool.

Benjy

How can I get my hands on these? I'm buying Fallingwater as soon as I can!

Misty

Love these, my son will definitely be building these. Inspirational!

DJ

OH MY GOSH - I feel like a kid again. I can't wait to get Fallingwater.

Willie

Are any of these sets actually available for purchase? If yes, where? If not, when?

Thanks

Charleen

What about the Ennis House? (might be the Ennis Brown house, now) I know that they've been restoring it for years, and were having problems with the money; this could help them with that.

Harold

These are too simplistic to be of any value! Just too few pieces to do the architecture justice. The final model looks like a cartoon caricature of the real thing. What a waste of a brilliant opportunity!! especially since those of us that would've bought these, would have paid a premium for a complete set. sadness is thy word of the day

Devlin

I wonder if they will expand this collection to include other architects? The Sagrada Família would be pretty wild.

Christine Lindquist

Does it come with a Frank Lloyd Wright Lego Man?

equitus

The scale on these are tiny. FW is maybe 10" across. I guess they need to be affordable.

garet

i've been suggesting this for years, its about time!

v p

sagrada familia? yeah right. if they ever finish that thing.

samy

Hello,
I thought this item might be of interest to you:
“Frank Lloyd Wright on Record”. (Produced by Caedmon Records, Inc., New York.)
I inherited this record from my father-in law who is a huge fan of Mr. Frank Lloyd Wright. The record is in mint condition and I have listened to it and sounds like he is in my living room! Including a copy of the mp3 file (or cd) that I personally recorded.
Here is the link on the item itself and attached pictures of the actual record.
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/jjcRH_b1OMhWvZruXTec2A?feat=directlink
If interested in purchasing it on e-bay, here is the item number (start bid is .$99): (item number 170334570024): http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=170334570024

Thank you.

Dennis Bolt

The Sears Tower and Hancock Buildings in this series are just as simplistic, or even worse. Sears is just 3 inches of black legos with some gray pieces for antenna. I could have built that myself with my kids leftover legos. Since the market for these things are sophisticated adults or nerdy kids, they could have done better detail. If they can do the death star, than at least they could attempt detail here.

cameron

i would rather see them come out with one kit that allowed you to build many different famous landmark structures with the same blocks with included multiple instructions. Lego unfortunately is all about max monetization.

Bill Bourn

Cameron, of course, is all about min monetization, whatever that is. I won't be looking to see if you already have, Cameron, but I bet if you made a creditable model of any famous landmark structure, there would be interest in it to correspond to its intricacy and detail. Adam Tucker would quite likely be leading the pack.

With regard to what gets to be a Lego set, there are many, many factors, of which the amount of money that can be made selling it is understandably prominent. I am thoroughly tired of complaints of the form "if only corp. X would make a good Y or Z." To the extent that someone's posted opinion contains such a statement, the rest of the posting gets discounted.

FWIW, Lego's Creator series of sets has featured multiple instructions for the several years now. This is a product line I encourage by buying them. My guess is that in the happy circumstance of the Architecture series becoming as successful as, say, Star Wars, we can hope to see multiple instructions in them too.

Bill Bourn

Dennis Bolt laments the simplicity of the early Architecture sets. First, I find it amazing that the structures involved can be so simply rendered and recognized. We were invited to use the same bricks from the Sears tower set to make our own distinctive building during a session at Brickworld.

Second, pick any small piece-count Lego set and observe the recognizability of the model those pieces can make. It makes no sense to complain about the lack of a rearview mirror on a tiny car model, does it?

Third, do you have insider information about Lego's target marketing, Dennis? I think Lego has made a minimal "risk" foray into the Architecture series by starting small and is now extending it to more medium sizes. In the event of continued success, we can look forward to larger, and more detailed models. BTW, target market for Taj Mahal? Eiffel Tower?

S KU

The Barcelona Pavillion by Mies would be good a LEGO model.

MaeEast

The unfortunate thing about most any Lego product these days is all the 'fun' has already been had by the product manager, when he (usually it's a 'he') designed it. Just check out the Lego website and you'll see.
Instead of various building block sets, like the original versions, and allowing (even encouraging) a kid's creativity, current Lego products are designed to be put together in one specific configuration -- and only that configuration. It's a paint-by-numbers (and not in a good way).

michael kowalczyk

A prairie school piece (most likely robie house) would be amazing to be able to build. I've been attempting that for years with my kids' legos. It's fun but you can never get the proportions, colors, etc. correct with standard blocks.
The roofs are impossible as well.
That building is most indicative of his most popular work, as well as being the best known prairie building...
You could also then create your own interpretations as well...
Fun for any aspiring architect:)

Eric Jackson-Forsberg

I would love to see Robie House or Martin House sets! One of the great Prairie houses should definitely be next.

Paul Kaplan

Wow, I can't wait to get a set! Now, lets see Lego produce of blocks with a Gaudi influence!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

TEAM
MISSION
CONTACT